Amazon AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty Reliable Exam Tutorial & AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty Associate Level Exam
P.S. Free & New AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty dumps are available on Google Drive shared by TestBraindump: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1MUR5aLWp38Yol0GB4AFXbteWv5Z4QLxX
The Amazon AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty mock tests are specially built for you to evaluate what you have studied. These AWS Certified Machine Learning - Specialty (AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty) practice exams (desktop and web-based) are customizable, which means that you can change the time and questions according to your needs. Our AWS Certified Machine Learning - Specialty (AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty) practice tests teach you time management so you can pass the AWS Certified Machine Learning - Specialty (AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty) certification exam.
The AWS Certified Machine Learning - Specialty certification is ideal for individuals who are interested in pursuing a career in machine learning and want to gain recognition for their skills and knowledge. AWS Certified Machine Learning - Specialty certification is also suitable for professionals who are already working in the field of machine learning and want to enhance their knowledge and skills.
The AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty Certification is ideal for professionals who want to advance their careers in the field of machine learning. AWS Certified Machine Learning - Specialty certification is recognized globally and is valued by employers who are looking for skilled machine learning professionals. AWS Certified Machine Learning - Specialty certification is also a great way to demonstrate your expertise in machine learning to potential clients and customers.
>> Amazon AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty Reliable Exam Tutorial <<
Amazon AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty Associate Level Exam & AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty Valid Test Simulator
Simplified language allows candidates to see at a glance. With this purpose, our AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty learning materials simplify the questions and answers in easy-to-understand language so that each candidate can understand the test information and master it at the first time, and they can pass the test at their first attempt. Our experts aim to deliver the most effective information in the simplest language. Each candidate takes only a few days can attend to the AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty Exam. In addition, our AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty provides end users with real questions and answers. We have been working hard to update the latest AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty learning materials and provide all users with the correct AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty answers. Therefore, our AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty learning materials always meet your academic requirements.
Amazon AWS Certified Machine Learning - Specialty Sample Questions (Q40-Q45):
NEW QUESTION # 40
A machine learning (ML) specialist is using the Amazon SageMaker DeepAR forecasting algorithm to train a model on CPU-based Amazon EC2 On-Demand instances. The model currently takes multiple hours to train. The ML specialist wants to decrease the training time of the model.
Which approaches will meet this requirement7 (SELECT TWO )
Answer: B,E
Explanation:
The best approaches to decrease the training time of the model are C and D, because they can improve the computational efficiency and parallelization of the training process. These approaches have the following benefits:
C: Replacing CPU-based EC2 instances with GPU-based EC2 instances can speed up the training of the DeepAR algorithm, as it can leverage the parallel processing power of GPUs to perform matrix operations and gradient computations faster than CPUs12. The DeepAR algorithm supports GPU-based EC2 instances such as ml.p2 and ml.p33.
D: Using multiple training instances can also reduce the training time of the DeepAR algorithm, as it can distribute the workload across multiple nodes and perform data parallelism4. The DeepAR algorithm supports distributed training with multiple CPU-based or GPU-based EC2 instances3.
The other options are not effective or relevant, because they have the following drawbacks:
A: Replacing On-Demand Instances with Spot Instances can reduce the cost of the training, but not necessarily the time, as Spot Instances are subject to interruption and availability5. Moreover, the DeepAR algorithm does not support checkpointing, which means that the training cannot resume from the last saved state if the Spot Instance is terminated3.
B: Configuring model auto scaling dynamically to adjust the number of instances automatically is not applicable, as this feature is only available for inference endpoints, not for training jobs6.
E: Using a pre-trained version of the model and running incremental training is not possible, as the DeepAR algorithm does not support incremental training or transfer learning3. The DeepAR algorithm requires a full retraining of the model whenever new data is added or the hyperparameters are changed7.
References:
1: GPU vs CPU: What Matters Most for Machine Learning? | by Louis (What's AI) Bouchard | Towards Data Science
2: How GPUs Accelerate Machine Learning Training | NVIDIA Developer Blog
3: DeepAR Forecasting Algorithm - Amazon SageMaker
4: Distributed Training - Amazon SageMaker
5: Managed Spot Training - Amazon SageMaker
6: Automatic Scaling - Amazon SageMaker
7: How the DeepAR Algorithm Works - Amazon SageMaker
NEW QUESTION # 41
An insurance company developed a new experimental machine learning (ML) model to replace an existing model that is in production. The company must validate the quality of predictions from the new experimental model in a production environment before the company uses the new experimental model to serve general user requests.
Which one model can serve user requests at a time. The company must measure the performance of the new experimental model without affecting the current live traffic Which solution will meet these requirements?
Answer: C
Explanation:
The best solution for this scenario is to use shadow deployment, which is a technique that allows the company to run the new experimental model in parallel with the existing model, without exposing it to the end users. In shadow deployment, the company can route the same user requests to both models, but only return the responses from the existing model to the users. The responses from the new experimental model are logged and analyzed for quality and performance metrics, such as accuracy, latency, and resource consumption12.
This way, the company can validate the new experimental model in a production environment, without affecting the current live traffic or user experience.
The other solutions are not suitable, because they have the following drawbacks:
* A: A/B testing is a technique that involves splitting the user traffic between two or more models, and comparing their outcomes based on predefined metrics. However, this technique exposes the new experimental model to a portion of the end users, which might affect their experience if the model is not reliable or consistent with the existing model3.
* B: Canary release is a technique that involves gradually rolling out the new experimental model to a small subset of users, and monitoring its performance and feedback. However, this technique also exposes the new experimental model to some end users, and requires careful selection and segmentation of the user groups4.
* D: Blue/green deployment is a technique that involves switching the user traffic from the existing model (blue) to the new experimental model (green) at once, after testing and verifying the new model in a separate environment. However, this technique does not allow the company to validate the new experimental model in a production environment, and might cause service disruption or inconsistency if the new model is not compatible or stable5.
1: Shadow Deployment: A Safe Way to Test in Production | LaunchDarkly Blog
2: Shadow Deployment: A Safe Way to Test in Production | LaunchDarkly Blog
3: A/B Testing for Machine Learning Models | AWS Machine Learning Blog
4: Canary Releases for Machine Learning Models | AWS Machine Learning Blog
5: Blue-Green Deployments for Machine Learning Models | AWS Machine Learning Blog
NEW QUESTION # 42
A data scientist has a dataset of machine part images stored in Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS).
The data scientist needs to use Amazon SageMaker to create and train an image classification machine learning model based on this dataset. Because of budget and time constraints, management wants the data scientist to create and train a model with the least number of steps and integration work required.
How should the data scientist meet these requirements?
Answer: A
Explanation:
Explanation
The simplest and fastest way to use the EFS dataset for SageMaker training is to run a SageMaker training job with an EFS file system as the data source. This option does not require any data copying or additional integration steps. SageMaker supports EFS as a data source for training jobs, and it can mount the EFS file system to the training container using the FileSystemConfig parameter. This way, the training script can access the data files as if they were on the local disk of the training instance. References:
Access Training Data - Amazon SageMaker
Mount an EFS file system to an Amazon SageMaker notebook (with lifecycle configurations) | AWS Machine Learning Blog
NEW QUESTION # 43
A company's Machine Learning Specialist needs to improve the training speed of a time-series forecasting model using TensorFlow. The training is currently implemented on a single-GPU machine and takes approximately 23 hours to complete. The training needs to be run daily.
The model accuracy js acceptable, but the company anticipates a continuous increase in the size of the training data and a need to update the model on an hourly, rather than a daily, basis. The company also wants to minimize coding effort and infrastructure changes What should the Machine Learning Specialist do to the training solution to allow it to scale for future demand?
Answer: D
Explanation:
To improve the training speed of a time-series forecasting model using TensorFlow, the Machine Learning Specialist should change the TensorFlow code to implement a Horovod distributed framework supported by Amazon SageMaker. Horovod is a free and open-source software framework for distributed deep learning training using TensorFlow, Keras, PyTorch, and Apache MXNet1. Horovod can scale up to hundreds of GPUs with upwards of 90% scaling efficiency2. Horovod is easy to use, as it requires only a few lines of Python code to modify an existing training script2. Horovod is also portable, as it runs the same for TensorFlow, Keras, PyTorch, and MXNet; on premise, in the cloud, and on Apache Spark2.
Amazon SageMaker is a fully managed service that provides every developer and data scientist with the ability to build, train, and deploy machine learning models quickly3. Amazon SageMaker supports Horovod as a built-in distributed training framework, which means that the Machine Learning Specialist does not need to install or configure Horovod separately4. Amazon SageMaker also provides a number of features and tools to simplify and optimize the distributed training process, such as automatic scaling, debugging, profiling, and monitoring4. By using Amazon SageMaker, the Machine Learning Specialist can parallelize the training to as many machines as needed to achieve the business goals, while minimizing coding effort and infrastructure changes.
References:
1: Horovod (machine learning) - Wikipedia
2: Home - Horovod
3: Amazon SageMaker - Machine Learning Service - AWS
4: Use Horovod with Amazon SageMaker - Amazon SageMaker
NEW QUESTION # 44
A company that promotes healthy sleep patterns by providing cloud-connected devices currently hosts a sleep tracking application on AWS. The application collects device usage information from device users. The company's Data Science team is building a machine learning model to predict if and when a user will stop utilizing the company's devices. Predictions from this model are used by a downstream application that determines the best approach for contacting users.
The Data Science team is building multiple versions of the machine learning model to evaluate each version against the company's business goals. To measure long-term effectiveness, the team wants to run multiple versions of the model in parallel for long periods of time, with the ability to control the portion of inferences served by the models.
Which solution satisfies these requirements with MINIMAL effort?
Answer: A
Explanation:
Amazon SageMaker is a service that allows users to build, train, and deploy ML models on AWS. Amazon SageMaker endpoints are scalable and secure web services that can be used to perform real-time inference on ML models. An endpoint configuration defines the models that are deployed and the resources that are used by the endpoint. An endpoint configuration can have multiple production variants, each representing a different version or variant of a model. Users can specify the portion of the inferences served by each production variant using the initialVariantWeight parameter. Users can also programmatically update the endpoint configuration to change the portion of the inferences served by each production variant using the UpdateEndpointWeightsAndCapacities API. Therefore, option B is the best solution to satisfy the requirements with minimal effort.
Option A is incorrect because creating multiple endpoints for each model would incur more cost and complexity than using a single endpoint with multiple production variants. Moreover, controlling the invocation of different models at the application layer would require more custom logic and coordination than using the UpdateEndpointWeightsAndCapacities API. Option C is incorrect because Amazon SageMaker Neo is a service that allows users to optimize ML models for different hardware platforms, such as edge devices. It is not relevant to the problem of running multiple versions of a model in parallel for long periods of time. Option D is incorrect because Amazon SageMaker batch transform is a service that allows users to perform asynchronous inference on large datasets. It is not suitable for the problem of performing real-time inference on streaming data from device users.
References:
Deploying models to Amazon SageMaker hosting services - Amazon SageMaker Update an Amazon SageMaker endpoint to accommodate new models - Amazon SageMaker UpdateEndpointWeightsAndCapacities - Amazon SageMaker
NEW QUESTION # 45
......
As you know, getting a AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty certificate is helpful to your career development. At the same time, investing money on improving yourself is sensible. You need to be responsible for your life. Stop wasting your time on meaningless things. We sincerely hope that you can choose our AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty Study Guide, which may change your life and career by just a step with according AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty certification. For we have helped so many customers achieve their dreams.
AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty Associate Level Exam: https://www.testbraindump.com/AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty-exam-prep.html
DOWNLOAD the newest TestBraindump AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty PDF dumps from Cloud Storage for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1MUR5aLWp38Yol0GB4AFXbteWv5Z4QLxX